Problem Clarification
1. The problem i found is in the appeal court , there are only
two appellant right? (DR Erik and Pantai Hospital). For both Bm and Bi version
of problem, i found out that the problem q showed that there are perayu kedua
dan ketiga (as u can see from bm first ground) and in bi the problem also
stated second appellant as second defendant> but suppose the second
defendant should be first appellant.
Not sure what is your Q. This is an appeal case and there are only two
appellants as the Court (from the first instance court i.e High Court) has
dismissed the First Defendant’s liabilities. The First Defendant is Dr.Raven
Sparks. The case is now appealed by the Second and Third Defendant namely the
Second and Third Appellant (following the court parties sequence).
2. The moot problem did not provide the
required information on the cover page, namely the information about court at
first instance where the parties are known as plaintiff and defendants
respectively. Even if we can make assumption that the court is at Malacca
as the hospital (defendant 3) is at Malacca. we are lacking of the information
on court suit no. and year
For example, (IN THE SESSIONS COURT AT
MALACCA, IN THE STATE OF MALACCA, MALAYSIA CIVIL NO: 58-108 OF
2012) as provided in the guideline uploaded by the committee
3. I am from group 25, and I want to clarify the Civil suit no.
of the case prior to the appeal and also the Court prior to the appeal. Thank
you.
For number 2 & 3:
Kindly refer to the blog announcement.
No comments:
Post a Comment