Nov 30, 2012

Preliminaries Finalist 2012/2013



Dear All, below are the shortlisted team for the Final Round of Law Moot Competition 2012/2013. The Organizing Committee would like to extend our greatest gratitude in congratulating all participants for their astounding performances during the Preliminary Rounds for Law Moot Competition 2012/2013. 

MMU LAW MOOT COMPETITION 2012/2013
OFFICIAL RESULTS
(TOP 5)
ENGLISH SESSION
APPELLANT
1.    TEAM 13 : NG YIH MIIN & MICHAEL TIE SIAW KAI
2.    TEAM 40 : MAYNA RAMESH PATEL & PUSHOTAMAN PUVANENDRAN
3.    TEAM 53 : HUSSEIN BIN AKHTAR & LEE JEE YUN
4.    TEAM 33 : AINUL AZZEATI BT. AHMAD & SHARIFAH FATIMAH YASMIN
5.    TEAM 7 : ARINA ONG XIN YI & WONG SHI YEW

RESPONDENT
1.    TEAM 17 : JEFFERY MOK & JACE CHONG
2.    TEAM 1 : NAN MUHAMMAD RIDHWAN B. ROSNAN & NUR DIYANA BT. ABDUL RAHIM
3.    TEAM 4 : PAVITHRA A/P VIJAYA KUMAR & RISHI KAUR A/P RAMINDERJEET SINGH
4.    TEAM 29 : MUHAMMAD ASYRAF BIN ZULKIPLI & ISWELJET SINGH DHILLON
5.    TEAM 63 : MOHAMMED MIRAN BIN MOHD. SALIP & AHMAD AKMAL BIN MOHD. MOHTAR

BM SESSION
PERAYU
1.    TEAM 18 : MELVIN TAY YEE SHIAN & GABRIEL KOO KION KEONG
2.    TEAM 36 : ONG YEE WEN & REBECCA LIM EN TZI
3.    TEAM 67 : LIM YI CHONG & ONG TA KHING
4.    TEAM 46 : SANGARAN A/L RAWISANDIRAN & BOOVENSWARAN MUNUSAMY
5.    TEAM 24 : NORHIDAYAH NADILA MAULAD DAUD & SHEIKH ZULHELMI

RESPONDEN
1.    TEAM 23 : CHAI YANG YU & OOI SHE YI
2.    TEAM 68 : AZHANNI BINTI CHE’MOIN & KELVIN NG CHANG HONG
3.    TEAM 28 : WINNIE HO SOOK FUN & CHEAH SUIT YEE
4.    TEAM 35 : AHMAD MUZHAFFAR BIN RAZAK & BENEDICT YEO WEI HUP
5.    TEAM 27 : WAN MUHD ARIFF AMEER & SITI SUHAILA JASMI

Congratulations to Team 13, 17, 18 and 23 for making into the final rounds of Multimedia University Law Moot Competition 2012/2013.

Regards,
Organizing Committee of Law Moot Competition 2012/2013

Nov 20, 2012

Dear Mooters,

Kindly please take note that the registration time for Friday (23 Nov) will start at 7.00p.m sharp and the latest time to register yourselves will be 7.30p.m.

On Saturday (24 Nov), the registration time for the morning session will start at 8.00a.m sharp and the latest time to register is 8.30a.m.  The afternoon session is at 1.00p.m and latest time to register is 1.30p.m.

Venue: CLC Concourse 2nd Floor In Front of the Elevator

Please be punctual and do not be late. For the mooters who come late will be penalised.


Nov 16, 2012

2012/2013 MMU Law Moot Competition Official Schedule

22nd November 2012 (Thursday)

Moot 1 : Team 44 v Team 42
Moot 2 : Team 43 v Team 56
Moot 3 : Team 50 v Team 66
Moot 4 : Team 33 v Team 63
Moot 5 : Team 57 v Team 5
Moot 6 : Team 8 v Team 3
Moot 7 : Team 15 v Team 48
Moot 8 : Team 7 v Team 16
Moot 10 : Team 30 v Team 4
Moot 15 : Team 14 v Team 59
Moot 17 : Team 45 v Team 17

23rd November 2012 (Friday)

Moot 1 : Team 52 v Team 64
Moot 2 : Team 24 v Team 6
Moot 3 : Team 62 v Team 28
Moot 4 : Team 54 v Team 65
Moot 5 : Moot 70 v Moot 2
Moot 6 : Moot 34 v Moot 39
Moot 7 : Moot 26 v Moot 23
Moot 8 : Moot 38 v Moot 69
Moot 9 : Moot 46 v Moot 27
Moot 10 : Moot 36 v Moot 35

23th November 2012 (Saturday - Morning)

Moot 9 : Team 20 v Team 60
Moot 11 : Team 10 v Team 31
Moot 12 : Team 53 v Team 29
Moot 13 : Team 9 v Team 19
Moot 14 : Team 25 v Team 1
Moot 16 : Team 13 v Team 22
Moot 18 : Team 40 v Team 32

24th November 2012 (Saturday - Afternoon)

Mut 11 : Team 18 v Team 11
Mut 12 : Team 67 v Team 68
Mut 13 : Team 37 v Team 12
Mut 14 : Team 49 v Team 61
Mut 15 : Team 55 v Team 21
Mut 16 : Team 41 v Team 47
Mut 17 : Team 58 v Team 51

Please note that this arrangement is final and the committee will not entertain any further request to rearrange the schedule. The committee had gave ample time to the participants to forward their request to us. It is the participants' responsibility to make sure that they attend their moot session  and your attendance is compulsory and failure to do so will se subjected to disciplinary actions.

PARTICIPANTS MAY NOT ATTEND ANOTHER MOOT SESSION BEFORE THEY HAVE COMPLETED THEIR OWN MOOT SESSION.

Nov 8, 2012

Exchange of Bundles

Dear Moot Participants,

Please be reminded that this Friday will be the exchanging of bundles. The details of exchanging of bundles will be as follows:

Date: 9th of November 2012
Time: 9a.m.-5p.m.
Venue: MPBR00016 (Where the statutes are distributed)

Thank you.

Regards,
Organizing Committee of Law Moot Competition 2012/2013


Nov 1, 2012

Submission of Memorial

Dear Mooters,


Your utmost attention is hereby requested on the following:

1. Problem clarification should be attached with the moot question in the memorial. Place it after the moot question. It supplements the original moot problem. Kindly be reminded that all teams must include both English and Bahasa Malaysia problem clarifications in their memorials. Teams mooting in English may rely on Bahasa Malaysia problem clarifications and vice versa.

2. Each team is required to submit four (4) bundles of memorial. Please tie up the memorials together and hand in to the organizing committee accordance to details as follow:

Date: 7th November 2012 (WEDNESDAY)

Venue: MPBR 0016 (room where the statute books were distributed)

Time: 9.00a.m. – 5.00p.m.

Prior to the submission of memorials, please contact:

Lisa: 0193719302 or Ida: 0193762035

*Please take note that the organizing committee will not provide any memorials, all participants are required to bring along their respective memorials during the competition.

*Please take note that only one day will be allocated for the submission of memorials. Failure to comply with the requirements will be subjected to serious disciplinary action.

*Late submission of memorials would not be entertained, and the team shall be responsible for their own actions.

3. Please take note that there are clarifications made to ‘Structure of Memorial’ - (no. 4) relating to Length of Argument. Each argument must not exceed eight (8) pages including both counsel’s and co-counsel’s argument. Participants may have more than one (1) argument.

Preliminary Rounds: 22nd - 24th November 2012

For any further inquiries, please do not hesitate to contact us or email us at our official mailing address mmulawmoot@yahoo.com.

Regards,
Organizing Committee of Law Moot Competition 2012/2013

Oct 29, 2012

Answers for Problem Clarification (BM)


Pasangan                                             Penjelasan  Masalah

Pasangan12                                         1. Apakah subjek yang terlibat dalam perjanjian jual beli tersebut?
-          Rujuk pada fakta kes

2. Adakah kedua belah pihak terikat dengan perjanjian yang ditanda tangani pada 31 Mac 2010?
- Ya

3. Pihak manakah yang telah melanggar perjanjian jual beli tersebut?
- Rujuk pada fakta kes

4. Apakah transaksi yang telah dibuat dalam jual beli antara perayu dan respondent?
- Rujuk pada fakta kes ( soalan kurang jelas)

5. Pelanggaran kontrak oleh sebelah pihak, adakah mereka subjek kepada klausa 10.1 perjanjian tersebut?
-rujuk pada fakta kes

6. Apakah yang di maksudkan oleh klausa 10.1 perjanjian tersebut.
- ‘mooters’ perlu memahaminya sendiri

7. Atas alasan apakah RB yakin bahawa mereka terlepas dari meneruskan perjanjian secara sah setelah gagal membuat pembayaran?
- rujuk pada fakta kes

8. Adakah RS telah memberikan notis 30 hari kepada RB seperti yang ditetapkan sebelum mengaplikasikan klausa 10.1?
- andaian oleh ‘mooters’


Pasangan18                                         1. Adakah Responden memberikan notis sepanjang 30 hari kepada perayu untuk membetulkan pelanggarannya? 
                                                           
- andaian oleh ‘mooters’

2. A) Adakah jumlah wang deposit sama dengan jumlah bayaran ansuran pertama?
- tidak sama

B) kalau tidak, Apakah perbezaan antara jumlah deposit dengan jumlah bayaran ansuran pertama? 
- Deposit 10% dan jumlah ansuran RM83,500 (andaian ‘mooters)

3.  Sejak bilakah Masalah kecairan mula berlaku? 

- andaian oleh ‘mooters’

4.  Sejak bilakah peraturan Bank Negara dikuatkuasakan? 
- andaian oleh ‘mooters’

Pasangan 23                                        1. Adakah RB dalam keadaan yang waras dan kompeten, apabila RB menandatangani perjanjian itu dengan RS?
                                                            -tidak relevan
2. Adakah RB telah meneliti, memastikan dan memahami tentang syarat-syarat perjanjian dengan RS ini apabila memeterai perjanjian jual beli ini? 
-tidak relevan
3. Apakah penaakulan yang diberikan oleh hakim yang bijaksana apabila hakim yang bijaksana memberikan penghakiman untuk membayar pampasan/ganti rugi dan menafikan tuntutan RS tentang pelaksanan specifik?    
-- andaian oleh ‘mooters’
4. Adakah perjanjian yang ditandatangani antara RB dan RS pernah mengatakan bahawa RB akan membeli tanah tersebut dengan mendapat pinjaman wang daripada bank? - andaian oleh ‘mooters’
5. Adakah RS menegaskan tuntutan pelaksanaan spesifik pada setiap masa dalam rayuan ini?
-siapa yang merayu
6. Apakah butir-butiran dalam garispanduan Bank Negara berhubung dengan pinjaman kepada sektor hartanah?
-andaian oleh ‘mooters’

Pasangan 24                                        1. Jumlah ansuran yang dibayar oleh pihak Rahmat Bulat sdn bhd , adakah didalam jumlah RM 83,500 atau pun RM 83.5 juta ?
-          Tidak relevan

Pasangan 28                                        1. Ke atas apakah sebab Bank Negara menolakkan pemimjaman kepada Rahmat Bulat Sdn Bhd?
                                                            -andaian oleh’ mooters’
2. Apakah kecairan yang dibuat oleh Bank Negara ke atas pemimjaman tersebut? 
-andaian oleh ‘mooters’
3. Adakah kontrak (Klausa 10.1) yang dibuat oleh kedua-dua pihak atas nasihat penasihat undang-undang?
-tidak relevan

Pasangan35                                         1. Adakah RS telah memberi notis pemberitahuan selama 30 hari kepada RB?
                                                            -andaian oleh ‘mooters’

2. Berapa lamakah RB memiliki hak tanah (Title) setelah memberitahu RS bahawa mereka telah gagal untuk mendapatkan pinjaman dan melunaskan hutang pembelian tanah tersebut?
-tidak relevan

3. Adakah kegagalan pemilikhakan tanah oleh RB (setelah gagal melunaskan hutang) dipulang semula kepada RS (Title)?
-tidak relevan

4. Mengikut klausa 10.1 perjanjian kontrak antara RB dan RS. RB membawa kes di atas hujahan frustrasi kontrak, isu-isu pliding oleh RS dan juga damage kecairan di bawah klausa 10.1. Apakah tuntutan  (isu-isu pliding) yang dibuat oleh RS? 
-andaian oleh ‘mooters’

5. Apakah yang dimaksudkan dengan keputusan Hakim di dalam mahkamah tinggi untuk tidak mengawardkan  pelucuthakan ansuran pertama di dalam klausa 10.1? (Hanya pelucuthakan deposit sahaja yang diberikan oleh Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi dan juga jumlah 11% setahun ke atas ansuran ketiga) 
- penghakiman merujuk kepada klausa 10.1 dan perenggan 4

6. Adakah tuntutan Pelaksanaan Spesifikasi Kontrak dan juga Frustrasi Kontrak oleh RS yang ditolak , dilakukan oleh Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi di atas budi bicara mahkamah? (Kegagalan pelaksanaan spesfikasi kontrak) dan hanya mengawardkan damage berdasarkan kepada deposit dan ansuran pertama dan ketiga. 
-rujuk fakta kes

7. Siapakah bank (mana-mana insititusi kewangan) yang dimaksudkan oleh RB untuk mendapatkan Pinjaman?
-tidak relevan

8. Di dalam klausa 10.1, Notis 30 hari oleh RS hanya perlu diberikan apabila kegagalan RB untuk melunaskan hutang tidak melibatkan ansuran kedua dan ketiga, Adakah ianya juga termasuk ansuran keempat yang gagal dilunaskan oleh RB (penyebab kepada permulaan prosiding di Mahkamah Tinggi)?
-tidak relevan

9. Adakah kegagalan melunaskan hutang (ansuran keempat oleh RB) menimbulkan isu penipuan (fraudulent) terhadap RS?
-tidak relevan


Pasangan51                                         1. Apakah tarikh pelucuthakan yang ditetapkan?
                                                            -tidak relevan
2. Adakah tarikh siap ditetapkan dalam perjanjian jual beli tersebut?
-tidak relevan
3. Adakah Bank Negara yang mengalami masalah kecairan ataupun RB Sdn. Bhd.?
-tidak relevan
4. Adakah RS membayar wang deposit (10%) dan wang ansuran berjumlah RM83,500 menggunakan wang sendiri atau wang daripada Bank Negara atau mana-mana institusi kewangan?
-tidak relevan
5. Adakah RB memenuhi syarat-syarat dan/atau peraturan-peraturan yang ditetapkan oleh Bank Negara semasa memohon pinjaman?
-tidak
6. Adakah pihak penjual (RS) telah menghantar notis kepada pihak pembeli (RB) dalam  tempoh 3o hari sepertimana yang ditetapkan di bawah klausa 10.1 perjanjian jual beli?
-andaian oleh ‘mooters’
7. Adakah dalam kontrak antara pihak penjual dan pembeli terdapat satu klausa yang menyatakan bahawa perjanjian tersebut adalah dibatalkan sekiranya pihak pembeli gagal mendapatkan pinnjaman daripada Bank Negara?
                                                            -andaian oleh ‘mooters’



Pasukan 44                                          1. Adakah sumber-sumber yang tidak berkaitan dengan undang-undang seperti artikel surat khabar dan sebagainya dibenarkan untuk diguna dalam hujahan?
                                                           -tidak dibenarkan
2. Adakah terdapat provisi dalam kontrak bahawa jikalau pinjaman tidak dapat didapati, apakah akan berlaku kepada parti-parti kontrak?
-andaian oleh’mooters’




Pasangan26                             1) Apa yang dimaksudkan dalam klausa 10.1      "jumlah yang bersamaan dengan kepada 11% setahun atas ansuran ketiga" ? 11% daripada jumlah mana? jumlah harga tanah tersebut atau jumlah ansuran yang dibayar?
-          Rujuk pada fakta kes

2) mengikut fakta dalam Klausa 10.1 hanya sebut mengenai ansuran pertama dan ansuran ketiga, bagaimana dengan ansuran kedua? adakah ia tidak perlu diambil kira?
-rujuk pada fakta kes







Answers for Problem Clarification (ENG)


Team Number                                     Problem Clarifications

Team 3                                                1. The value of the land during Rajesh Sinar Sdn. Bhd. (RS)’s failure to pay the balance of the purchase price.
                                                            -Mooters should calculate by themselves

2. The respective amount of first installment and third instalment.
-Total of three instalments is RM83,500- so mooters may assume the amount of the 1st and 3rd instalments


3. In line 8 of the second paragraph, it was stated that the learned judge awarded RS damages under cl 10.1 of the agreement, namely, the forfeiture of the first instalment, and 11% p.a. of the third instalment or portion remaining unpaid calculated from the due date until the date of such forfeiture by way of agreed liquidated damages. However, the next paragraph (paragraph 4) stated that the learned judged ordered for the forfeiture of the deposit and a sum amounting to 11% p.a. on the third instalment. As I understand it, the forfeiture of the first instalment is different from the forfeiture of the deposit. Line 8 of the second paragraph said that the learned judge gave effect to the damages stated under cl 10.1 of the agreement but at paragraph 4, his Lordship gave a different order. Please do clarify if it is meant to be an additional order/award and if not, whether the forfeiture of the first instalment was allowed by his Lordship or not.
-Forfeiture of the 1st instalment is different from the forfeiture of the deposit
-The order / decision made by the Judge is as per clause 10.1 and paragraph 4

4. The second ground of appeal stated that the words “liquidated damages awarded under cl 10.1”. I would like to clarify whether the liquidated damages as stated refer to the forfeiture of the first instalment, 11% p.a. of the third instalment and the portion remaining unpaid. As I know, liquidated damages refer to damages that are pre-determined and usually refer to the deposit paid by buyer. So I need a clarification as to whether the liquidated damages as stated refer solely to the damages stated under 10.1 of the agreement (which does not include deposit) or whether the liquidated damages also cover the forfeiture of the deposit as ordered by the learned judge in paragraph 4 (assuming that there is no mistake in such order). 
-The liquidated damages as stated refer solely to clause 10.1 of the agreement as per the 2nd ground of Appeal

5. Line 7 of the third paragraph. The words “portion thereof” refer to the third instalment only or both the third and the first instalments? Do the words “by way of agreed liquidated damages” refer to both the forfeiture of the first instalment, and the 11% p.a. of the third instalment/portion remaining unpaid?
-The ‘word portion thereof’- refer to both the instalment
-The word’ by way of agreed liquidated damages’ refer to both 1st instalment and the 11% of the 3rd instalment/ portion remaining unpaid

Team 5                                                1. May I know what is the due date as mentioned in clause 10.1 of the agreement in line 8 which states that ‘…remaining unpaid/outstanding calculated from the due date until the date of such forfeiture by way of agreed liquidated damages …’ ?
                                                            -assumption to be made by mooters

Team 7                                                1. Is there any special condition that Rahmah Bulat Sdn. Bhd. (RB) has to comply when seeking financial facility from the bank?
-          Is not mentioned in the facts- to make assumption

Team 8                                                1. Did RS send notice in writing to RB? (this fact is essential for the argument of RS’ compliance to the clause 10.1)
-          Assumption to be made by mooters

2. How long was the land title in RB’s possession after  they informed RS that they had failed to obtain the loan to pay the balance of the purchase price? 
- Irrelevant

3. According to the moot question, RB challenged the trial judge's decision on the issues of the frustration of the contract, the issues of the RS's claim in the pleading, and the agreed liquidated damages under the clause 10.1. What is ‘RS's claim in the pleading’ about?
-assumption to be made by mooters

4. It was written that the learned judge ordered forfeiture of deposit in the 4th paragraph (after the clause). Please clarify whether the order is inclusive of first instalment.
-Please refer to the judgment made by the Judge as per clause 10.1 and paragraph 4

Team 10                                              1. What is broad property? –to do research
2. What is liquidation problem? –the question is not clear

Team 22                                              1. When is the date of the transaction?
                                                            - There is breach of contract so no transaction took place
2. When is the due date for the full payment?
-assumption to be made by mooters

3. Is there any full written agreement of the transaction?
- written contract- yes

Team37                                               1. I would like to know are non legal sources allowed to be used as a source in mooting, like articles of newspaper, thesis and so on?
-          Not allowed

Team 60                                              1. We would like to identify whether Rajesh Sinar (the appellant) gave Rahmat Bulat (the respondent) any notice requiring the later to remedy the breaches he made toward RS? (as the facts are silent on this matter) If yes, has the notice expired?
                                                            -who is appellant and who is the respondent?
-assumption to be made by mooters

2. According to clause 10.1 of the contract, it states that a notice is only necessary if the breach does not involve the payment of the second instalment or the third instalment. Since the facts have stated that RB has paid for the three instalments, does it mean that RS needs not give a notice to RB and RS can forfeit the first instalment and the sum equivalent to eleven per annum on the third instalment…… as agreed by the parties?
-assumption to be made by mooters
3. We would like to know the interpretation of ‘portion thereof remaining unpaid/outstanding calculated from the due date until the date of such forfeiture by way of agreed liquidated damages’ as stated in Clause 10.1 of the contract.
-The ‘word portion thereof’- refer to both the instalment






Does the ‘remaining unpaid portion’ refer to the remaining amount in which the purchaser fails to remedy the vendor? In other words, does the ‘remaining unpaid portion’ refer to the remaining amount of the first instalment and 11% of the third instalment, in which the purchaser fails to pay, calculating from the due date of the notice?
-The word’ by way of agreed liquidated damages’ refer to both 1st instalment and the 11% of the 3rd instalment/ portion remaining unpaid

4. If the facts state that RS needs not serve a notice to RB as the breach does not involve the payment of second and third instalment, then how does the vendor forfeit the remaining unpaid portion as there is no notice, there will not be a due date of the notice until the date of such forfeiture?
-Irrelevant
5. The monies in which the vendor’s solicitors shall refund to the purchaser refer to what monies? The deposit, the second instalment and the remaining amount of the third instalment after paying 11% pa of it to the vendor as a remedy?
-assumption to be made by mooters based on the question
-the 2nd question -not clear

Oct 18, 2012

Announcement

Dear Mooters,

To ease the compilation process of the problem clarifications, please send in your clarifications in a word document (Microsoft Words). Furthermore, it will be strongly advisable if the subject of the e-mail will be named in the following manner:

Problem Clarifications - Team 1 (your respective team number)
Penjelasan Masalah - Pasangan 1 (nombor pasangan tertentu)

Please be reminded that the problem clarifications should be submitted in the language that the respective teams will be mooting in. This is because the compilation of the problem clarifications (BM and English) must be inserted in the mooter's memorial.

Regards,
MMU Law Moot Committee 2012/2013