Dec 20, 2013

Problem Clarification 2

Problem Clarification 2
1.      in the 9th paragraph "On the 11th day... the plaintiff progressed well with the amount of oxygen administered and the result was that he survived the ordeal." What does surviving the ordeal means? Did Luna survived the ordeal by being alive or does it mean surviving ordeal by not having any risk to his eyes?
Based on the facts given, it is saved to conclude that the meaning of the said statement is Luna survived as in Luna lives.

2.      in another paragraph, " On the third day... Because of this, the Second Defendant started the incubator oxygen at the same rate..." what is the same rate stated here? is it 5 liter per minute or 3 liter per minute?
Facts are silent. But referring to the chronological of the facts, one can make assumption.

3.      Adakah defendan dua seorang General Practitioners ataupun specialist?
Tiada dalam fakta kes. Andaian sewajarnya jika mahu dibuat adalah General Practitioners.

4.      Pada masa plaintif dalam inkubator dari minggu keenam ke minggu kesepuluh, beliau juga diperiksa atau dalam jagaan oleh ophthalmologist?
Soalan anda agak mengelirukan kerana kiraan tempoh dibuat dalam hari. Tetapi dari fakta kes, di perenggan 4 ada dinyatakan seperti berikut “Didalam semua keadaan, Plaintif dibawah pemerhatian jururawat-jururawat yang bertugas di Defendan Ketiga dan walaupun terdapat nota dan/atau catitan rawatan daripada jururawat ditandakan sebagai dokumen yang dipersetujui, tiada seorang pun jururawat dipanggil untuk memberikan keterangan.’

Andaian wajar boleh diberikan menggunakan fakta kes.

No comments: